Law Sociology Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

right Sociology - Case Study ExampleHowever, a warning has to be made on the public speaking system to ensure that no people are present when the sluice gates are undefendable and the water rushes in a torrent. On the afternoon of June 23, 2002, this did not happen when the sluice gates were opened. As a result two people drowned and seven were bodily injured.The case came to trial in the Ontario court of Justice in January 200. The two accused personnel, John Tammage and Robert Bednarek were accused of criminal negligence. The trial was a lengthy iodine and took 75 days getting over in December 2006. Both the accused, John Tammage who was a go of the management team and an electrical engineer and, Robert Bednarek who worked in the electrical department as an operator, were acquitted of the negligence charges. The court ruled that the defendants did not have any motive and their actions were devoid of any criminal intent.0.1 compendium The judgment ruled in favor of the big c ompany and expectedly did not relieve the common people. This ties in with the differential complaisant organization theory of Sutherland in 1938. The theory states that crime is backed by somewhat organizations. In other words, it claims that crime is inherent in certain big firms. The higher authorities or government choose to ignore it or nourishment it. Either way, crime benefits by garnering more support and voice. This theory can be further explained with reference to the securities industry. The securities industry expects a certain amount of malingerer and theft to occur every year. The industry does not react to prevent such petty crimes and consequently encourages crime to exist and flourish in society. This crime is organized within the industry. Sutherland adopted the concept of social disorganisation to explain the increases in crime that accompanied the transformation of preliterate and peasant societies where influences surrounding a person were steady, uniform, harmonious and consistent to modern Western civilisation which he believed was characterised by inconsistency, conflict and un-organization (1934 64). He also believed that the mobility, economic competition and an individualistic ideology that accompanied capitalist and industrial development had been creditworthy for the disintegration of the large family and homogenous neighbourhoods as agents of social control. The failure of extended kin groups expanded the neighborhood of relationships no longer controlled by the community and undermined governmental controls leading to persistent systematic crime and delinquency. He also believed that such disorganisation causes and reinforces the cultural traditions and cultural conflicts that support antisocial activity. The systematic quality of the conduct was a reference to repetitive, patterned or organised offending as opposed to random events. He depicted the law-abiding culture as dominant and more extensive than alternative crimino genic cultural views and undefendable of overcoming systematic crime if organised for that purpose (1939 8). But because society is organised around individual and low-down group interests, society permits crime to persist. Sutherland concluded that if the society is organised with reference to the values expressed in the law, the crime is eliminated if it is not organised, crime persists and develops (19398).Sutherland bases the theory on a few assumptions1. Criminal behavior is learned in interaction with other persons in a process